Exercises for March 23rd 2012 entry
Here are the solutions to the exercises of March 23rd entry, A Motivational Problem for the Study of Fourier Series.
Exercise 1: Show that in polar coordinates, the Laplacian is given by
.
Solution:
In terms of and
,
and
are functions given by
and
. We thus have :
Therefore, by the chain rule,
.
It is important at this point to realize that 1. and 2. are differential operators while their evaluation at , for example
, are functions. So that
is the evaluation of 1. at the function
. With this clarified, we can write explicitly what we have to calculate :
Applying distributivity of the differential operators on sums of functions and then the Leibniz rule (product rule) when the operator acts on a product of functions, we get, after simplifying,
In a similar way, we obtain (using the commutativity of and
)
.
Thus, summing these two expressions and using the identity , we get
as wanted.
QED
Exercise 2: Show that if
is a twice differentiable function satisfying
for some
, then there exists
such that
.
Solution:
We proceed in two steps. First, we show that can be written as
for some
. We’ll then show how this gives us the desired result.
Let be a twice differentiable function satisfying
. But then we have
so
is also twice differentiable. It’s first and second differentials are given respectively by
and
By induction,
is then infinitely differentiable and we have
for even values of
and
for odd values of
. The Taylor series expansion of
at
is thus given by
But, summing the Taylor series representation of and
, we get
Taking and
, we get
as wanted.
To conclude, let and
. We get, with Euler’s formula,
But since is an even function and
an odd function, this can be rewritten as
We also have
and
So putting all this together, we get
as desired.
QED
Exercise 3: Show that if
the only solutions of the differential equation
which are twice differentiable when
, are given by linear combinations of
and
when
, and 1 and
when
.
Solution:
If , then we have
so that
This means that
so
. We conclude that
for some
.
In case , we make the substitution
. We then have
So we get . By the chain rule, this can be rewritten as
which, by the product rule, is equal to
But since
, this gives us
which is equal to
by our original hypothesis.
The problem thus reduces to solving the resulting differential equation . But this is very similar to what we have done in exercise 2! In fact, it can be shown that there exists
such that
(the argument is the same as in exercise 2 but we consider
and
instead of
and
) so, since
, we have
which is
Hence
for some as wanted.
QED
Trackbacks & Pingbacks